mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Quickest 0-60 time launch control 2kg lighter at 264kg wet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Better aerodynamic to counter the power loss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Oh I forget the hill hold for the infirmed old gits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 MCN worse on fuel from 50mpg to 42 mpg that won’t suit BHM DD3 176 miles from tank he gets 245miles with his 19/40 gearing needs the 3 cats removed and better cam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekinley Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Just now, mark3evo said: MCN worse on fuel from 50mph to 42 mpg that won’t suit BHM 176 miles from tank How can it be worse on fuel and more economic at the same time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikaS Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Just now, Mekinley said: How can it be worse on fuel and more economic at the same time It is the same magic as in new cars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOHN-DYNOSTAR Posted February 5, 2021 Author Share Posted February 5, 2021 DD3 model (dead duck 3 ) stole some one else's info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOHN-DYNOSTAR Posted February 5, 2021 Author Share Posted February 5, 2021 Basically changed the cam timing and put longer intake stacks on to cope and give more mid range we did this 4 years ago with Roddys and 5 years ago with Bazz's. this is bad because if you add the electronics they only reduce what you already have all the other manufacturers have more power which demand electronics to control it . and Hill start FFS , Grandad bike . oh sorry forgot some of you are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 3 minutes ago, JOHN-DYNOSTAR said: Basically changed the cam timing and put longer intake stacks on to cope and give more mid range we did this 4 years ago with Roddys and 5 years ago with Bazz's. this is bad because if you add the electronics they only reduce what you already have all the other manufacturers have more power which demand electronics to control it . i'm gonna hang on, i like a nice handling bike ( i hear the piss takers Dr Evo can't ride) STOCK GEN2 shockers etc it means me having to spend more dosh upgrading Ohlins and front end, plus my carbon water ingress wheels wont fit i need to spend another £5k to make it mike mine improved, i like more power and it will stick in my head it will be 15 rwhp down on mine was at it height 195 hp if stockGEN2 is 185 at wheels now its down ANOTHER 7 hp - I WILL FEEL that no.... that ain't good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark3evo Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 It just means poor riders can ride more safely goes for a lie down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.